Robert David Sanders Novak

Robert Novak is a political glossator and political figure who is have it off for his skilful wing views even though he is a registered democrat. consort to wikipedia.org, he was born in 1931. He gradational with a Bachelor of Arts degree and soon went on to prepare going a lieutenant in the U.S. Army. From at that place he slowly worked his way up, writing for various intelligence operationpapers, until he locate up himself operative in Washington, D.C. for the Associated Press. He quickly began working for The wall Street Journal and eventually began working at CNN. However, animosity surrounded him, and in a heated cut into he walked off of the set of a CNN show. He was suspended, hardly later asked to benefactor out with stories. He eventually refused the convolution and began add to FOX News, CNN?s main competitor (wikipedia.org). Mr. Novak has some knock-down(prenominal) views about many divergent political topics. I set up it difficult to follo w him in his various phrases for several divergent reasons. The starting time reason that bothers me is that he is a registered democrat, save he have a very right-wing train of thought. I understand that just because deal separate that they are a democrat or republi asshole, they don?t have to be completely, one hundred percent Liberal democrat or Conservative Republi after part. I am a democrat, and have issues with a bantam of the troupe?s extreme thoughts, exclusively eradicate consider myself a democrat. Most of the articles that I looked at real made me feel like what I was reading was feeler shot from a die-hard Republican in Democrat clothing. The guerrilla problem I have with Mr. Novak is that he seems to non be able to just report on the news, save I feel as if he also mustiness comment on a lot of the material there. However, he doesn?t just straight out comment on the separate that he might have problems with. He tends to recuperate the meticu lous words to describe the function so that! you know what he is call downing about. I like to hear other people?s opinions as much as the next guy, but it compacts tiring after a spell when the person commenting can?t come out and say what they think without the tricksy back-handed words. One of the main topics in the news today concerns the fight in the latest conflict in the philia tocopherol. deuce of Mr. Novak?s articles dealt specifi plowy with the war in the Middle East. I am going to attempt to comment on these articles by summarizing them and trying to decode Mr. Novak?s clever wordplay. The first article that I read was titled Murtha?s second operate (realclearpolitics.com). It was about Republican John Murtha?s way on NBC?s ?Meet the Press? con June 18, 2006. Murtha, who is a candidate for the majority leader in the kinsfolk of Representatives, ? perennial his call for ?redeploying? U.S. soldiery from Iraq with something new.? He suggested that ?we can go to Okinawa? [and can] redeploy there alm ost instantly.? Moderator Tim Russert ? educeed doubt about a ? apropos response? from Okinawa to meet a Middle East crisis, [Murtha] stumbled: ?Well, it ? you know, they ? when I say Okinawa, I, I?m saying troops in Okinawa. When I say a timely response, you know, our fighters can evaporate from Okinawa very quickly. And ? and ? when they don?t know we?re coming.?? Mr. Novak tells a little history about Murtha, and tells a little more(prenominal) on the predicament that Murtha got himself in before he begins to peach about how disturbing it is to Republicans that Murtha is up for the majority leader of the theater (realclearpolitics.com). I do think that it was a bad piazza and a bad judgment call on Murtha?s part, and so does Mr. Novak. However, the reader can not friend but to feel a slight disappointment in Novak for Murtha. It seems as if he expected more out of Murtha and the Republican political party as a whole.

I can?t help but think that Novak wished he Murtha would not have express what he did. The second article was called Holy Land Christians distinction Israel (suntimes.com). It states ?on June 19, two young members of Congress received an all-time letter from Jerusalem. On behalf of Christian churches in the Holy Land, they were told a House resolution they were circulating blaming the Palestinian Authority for Christian decline there ?is based on many take over affirmations.? The Very Rev. Michael H. Sellers, an Anglican priest who is coordinator of Jerusalem?s Chirstian churches, verbalize the real problem is the Israeli occupation ? especially it?s new security wall? (suntimes.com). It seems in this arti cle, Mr. Novak again tries to be a true reporter. However, I feel that he failed again in his efforts. There is still the element of opinion that wants to be seen in his work, and although this article does a better job of haze over that opinion, I can still feel it buried underneath the context of the piece. Ultimately, it appears to me that Mr. Novak is playing a role. He appears to be strong on some issues and weak or incoherent on other issues. He seems as if he wants to be alike many people at once: a newscaster, an arbitrary conservative republican, and a democrat for when the republicans say something he doesn?t like. I respect his journalism but not his views because in what I read he didn?t seem to save one strong stand in any of the articles. work CitedHoly Land Christians blame Israel. July 2006. Chicago Sun-Times. 19 July. 2006 . Murtha?s jiffy Act. June 2006. Real Clear Politics. 22 June. 2006 . Robert Novak. July 2006. Wikipedia. 20 July. 2006 . If you want to get! a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay