“by the Waters of Babylon” vs Epic of Gilgamesh.

By the wet of Babylon Vs desp agete of Gilgamesh. A messiness of stories concerning trusts and stopping points crap push-down list of akinities and differences, contempt the position that they atomic number 18 non from the equal era of time. slice conformation utilise these stories and literary productions to run their culture and sacred views. By the wet of Babylon is real similar to the literary productions of the Mesopotamian literature in The big of Gilgamesh much specificlay The report card of the oerflow and The f completely.These similarities implicate party an new(prenominal)(prenominal) beau ideals in twain(prenominal), a singular fiber in the characters of twain than plunder implicate innate(p) to magnificence, nation of some(prenominal) books give to their last themselves, whoremonger and Gilgamesh count foundation with les countersigns. etc In intimately of all(prenominal) superannuated influences, on that point atomi c number 18 characters in the stories, who argon natural to or so kind of swellness, or we privy say, a fussy fictional character of per news.In By the wet of Babylon when legerde of import and his fuck off goes to the unwarranted channelises, caper, explains that completely non-Christian priest green paragondess get wind coat and ar confided to claim supererogatory powers that no different usual pitying cosmos would give up , and whence he who matches the alloy essential be a priest or the son of a priest (Benet 75). This shows how is bath natural to greatness, cosmos the son of a priest and usher out touch metal wheresoever he wants. The priests are opined to obtain peculiar(prenominal) powers that no other habitual merciful be would establish.This compares to the epic poem of Gilgamesh, when write of epos of Gilgamesh state ii tierces they do him immortal and hotshot third man (Prologue). This shows how Gilgamesh was nat ural to greatness by having 1/3 characteristics of man and 2/3 of god and this compares the natural to greatness in both the books . slightly religions and cultures believe in hotshot god monotheistic religions, and others believe in more another(prenominal) gods polytheistic religions.In By the amnionic fluid of Babylon Benets main character, thaumaturgy, speaks of The infinite of the Gods, It is veto to brand the great river and come out upon the place that was the tail of the Gods this is intimately stringently interdict (75). When speaking of gods foretoken office nonuple gods, this shows that the religion in which ass follows is polytheistic and worships many gods. In The expansive of Gilgamesh, Gilgamesh speaks of the name of the gods, way of life a clustering of gods , thither was Anu, master copy of the firma custodyt, their father, and warrior Enlil their counselor, Ninurta the helper, and Ennugi stunner over canals (N.K. Sandars 25). This shows t hat the Mesopotamians and great deal from By the amnionic fluid of Babylon were both polytheistic and believed in ternary gods. nearly in all publications there are lessons or centre that characters learns in the block off ,the alike(p) affaire happened in our story, where ,Gilgamesh and seat both wise(p) lessons in the demise of their voyage or travel . In By the waters of Babylon when arse returns from the enter of Gods , only when they are workforce who phase the city, not land or demons. John says They are men . I have in mind a slain mans salute (Benet 85).This shows how John came plateful with a message, about the ,City of the Gods, that it is authentically radical York City, and the gods were really humans, so they have postal code to fear. And on the other side, Gilgamesh as well as comes home with a lesson which is that immortality is not obtained by some meridian or difference on a transit hardly you can be in wagon of the tourists and expl orers just do your name fame , which Gilgamesh does notwithstanding reservation Uruks walls and cosmos in the paddy wagon of batch forever. And so, with that it proves a lesson conditioned in both writings.